Structural Changes in Russia–Kazakhstan Economic Cooperation: Evidence from Trade and Business Entities
https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-89-105
Abstract
Economic cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan has been undergoing significant changes in recent years under the influence of external economic constraints and the transformation of regional economic ties.
The aim of this article is to assess how Russia–Kazakhstan economic cooperation has evolved under sanctions by examining changes in bilateral trade, organizational embeddedness, and relative structural position between 2018 and 2025.
The analysis uses Kazakhstan as a focused empirical setting and traces developments from 2018 to 2025, with the earlier years serving as a pre-shock benchmark. The results indicate that bilateral trade rose sharply after 2022, then remained elevated without further expansion. The results showed that a structural asymmetry of trade flows was revealed: Kazakhstan’s exports to Russia decreased from 9.55–9.56 billion US dollars in 2024 to 8.14 billion US dollars in 2025, while imports from Russia increased from 18.24 billion US dollars to 19.26 billion US dollars. Russian-linked firms also retained the largest foreign business presence in Kazakhstan. At the same time, the growing weight of China altered Russia’s relative standing rather than removing its importance. The study shows that cooperation under sanctions is better understood as differentiated restructuring than as simple expansion and contraction. Thus, the economic cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan does not show signs of either steady expansion or consistent reduction, but is developing in the form of structural adjustment at a high level of interaction.
About the Authors
L. Zhang
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Li’ang Zhang, PhD Student
Almaty
D. Ning
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Argentina
Argentina
Deshun Ning, PhD Student
Faculty of Philosophy and Letters
Buenos Aires
References
1. Afesorgbor, S. K. (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.06.002
2. Arapova, E. (2023). The sanctions dilemma: How sanctions on Russia affect regional integration among EAEU states. Strategic Analysis, 47(3), 289–294. doi: 10.1080/09700161.2023.2247746
3. Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2007). Trade deflection and trade depression. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 176–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.09.005
4. Braun, M., Gromilova, A., & Melnikovová, L. (2024). Understanding economic integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: The relevance of integration theories. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2023.2193877
5. Bureau of National Statistics. (2026). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://stat.gov.kz/en
6. Crozet, M., & Hinz, J. (2020). Friendly fire: The trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions. Economic Policy, 35(101), 97–146. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eiaa006
7. Drezner, D. W. (2003). The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization, 57(3), 643–659. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303573052
8. Early, B. R. (2015). Busted sanctions: Explaining why economic sanctions fail. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780804794329
9. Early, B. R., & Peksen, D. (2019). Searching in the shadows: The impact of economic sanctions on informal economies. Political Research Quarterly, 72(4), 821–834. doi: 10.1177/1065912918806412
10. Felbermayr, G., Kirilakha, A., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2020). The global sanctions data base. European Economic Review, 129, 103561. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103561
11. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
12. Haidar, J. I. (2017). Sanctions and export deflection: Evidence from Iran. Economic Policy, 32(90), 319–355. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix002
13. Hudson, V. (2022). The impact of Russian soft power in Kazakhstan: Creating an enabling environment for cooperation between Nur-Sultan and Moscow. Journal of Political Power, 15(3), 469–494. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2022.2127280
14. Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3<sup>rd</sup> ed.). Peterson Institute for International Economics.
15. Ibrayeva, A., Kozhirova, S., Nechayeva, Y., Shukyzhanova, A., & Zhanbulatova, R. (2023). Cross-border geopolitics: Ambivalent aspect of the border issue in relationship between Kazakhstan and Russia. Comparative Strategy, 42(4), 587–601. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2023.2219196
16. Kemme, D. M., Akhmetzaki, Y., & Mukhamediyev, B. M. (2021). The effects of the Eurasian Economic Union on regional foreign direct investment and implications for growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(5), 643–660. doi: 10.1080/09638199.2021.1896769
17. Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Eurasian regionalism and Russia’s war against Ukraine: Consequences for the EAEU and Kazakhstan. Russian Analytical Digest, 287, 2–6. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000577719
18. Makhmutova, E. (2019). Sanctions against Russia and their impact on the Eurasian Economic Union. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(3), 99–116. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-03-05
19. Morgan, T. C., Syropoulos, C., & Yotov, Y. V. (2023). Economic sanctions: Evolution, consequences, and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 3–30. doi: 10.1257/jep.37.1.3
20. Myrzakhmetova, A., Panfilova, E., & Turgel, I. (2019). Cross-border cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia. In I. Turgel, A. Pereverzeva, & J. Karbach (Eds.), Economic and social development : Book of proceedings (pp. 115–122). Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency.
21. National Bank. (2026). Net position on direct investment according to the directional principle. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/116049
22. Pape, R. A. (1997). Why do economic sanctions not work. International Security, 22(2), 90–136. doi: 10.1162/isec.22.2.90
23. Pomerlyan, E., & Belitski, M. (2024). Regional integration and economic performance: Evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 65(5), 627–655. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2163414
24. Sedrakyan, G. S. (2022). Economic sanctions against Russia: How will the neighboring transition economies be affected? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(4), 843–861. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.09.004
25. Yakovenko, N. V., Rakhimbekova, Z. S., Azarova, N. A., Klimova, T. B., Ashimova, A. A., Tsoy, M. Y., Semenova, L. V., & Yelubayeva, Z. M. (2026). Structural contrasts and potential of complementarity of national innovation systems of Russia and Kazakhstan in the context of EAEU integration. Sustainability, 18(4), 1753. doi: 10.3390/su18041753
Review
For citations:
Zhang L., Ning D. Structural Changes in Russia–Kazakhstan Economic Cooperation: Evidence from Trade and Business Entities. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2026;70(2):89-105. https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-89-105
Views:
27
JATS XML
Email this article 