ejebsEurasian Journal of Economic and Business StudiesНазвание журнала на русском2789-82532789-8261University of International Business named after K. Sagadiyev LLP10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-89-105ejebs-283Research ArticleСтатьиStructural Changes in Russia–Kazakhstan Economic Cooperation: Evidence from Trade and Business Entitieshttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-7687-7128ZhangL.

Li’ang Zhang, PhD Student

Almaty

zlachn@qq.comhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-6966-8246NingD.

Deshun Ning, PhD Student

Faculty of Philosophy and Letters

Buenos Aires

ningdeshun@filo.uba.arAl-Farabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstanUniversidad de Buenos AiresArgentina20260507202670289105Copyright © Zhang L., Ning D., 20262026Zhang L., Ning D.Zhang L., Ning D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ejebs.uib.kz/jour/article/view/283

   Economic cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan has been undergoing significant changes in recent years under the influence of external economic constraints and the transformation of regional economic ties.

   The aim of this article is to assess how Russia–Kazakhstan economic cooperation has evolved under sanctions by examining changes in bilateral trade, organizational embeddedness, and relative structural position between 2018 and 2025.

   The analysis uses Kazakhstan as a focused empirical setting and traces developments from 2018 to 2025, with the earlier years serving as a pre-shock benchmark. The results indicate that bilateral trade rose sharply after 2022, then remained elevated without further expansion. The results showed that a structural asymmetry of trade flows was revealed: Kazakhstan’s exports to Russia decreased from 9.55–9.56 billion US dollars in 2024 to 8.14 billion US dollars in 2025, while imports from Russia increased from 18.24 billion US dollars to 19.26 billion US dollars. Russian-linked firms also retained the largest foreign business presence in Kazakhstan. At the same time, the growing weight of China altered Russia’s relative standing rather than removing its importance. The study shows that cooperation under sanctions is better understood as differentiated restructuring than as simple expansion and contraction. Thus, the economic cooperation between Russia and Kazakhstan does not show signs of either steady expansion or consistent reduction, but is developing in the form of structural adjustment at a high level of interaction.

EconomyEconomic CooperationEconomic SanctionBilateral TradeForeign TradeTrading StructureInternational BusinessReferencesAfesorgbor, S. K. (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.06.002Afesorgbor, S. K. (2019). The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions? European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.06.002Arapova, E. (2023). The sanctions dilemma: How sanctions on Russia affect regional integration among EAEU states. Strategic Analysis, 47(3), 289–294. doi: 10.1080/09700161.2023.2247746Arapova, E. (2023). The sanctions dilemma: How sanctions on Russia affect regional integration among EAEU states. Strategic Analysis, 47(3), 289–294. doi: 10.1080/09700161.2023.2247746Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2007). Trade deflection and trade depression. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 176–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.09.005Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2007). Trade deflection and trade depression. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 176–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.09.005Braun, M., Gromilova, A., & Melnikovová, L. (2024). Understanding economic integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: The relevance of integration theories. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2023.2193877Braun, M., Gromilova, A., & Melnikovová, L. (2024). Understanding economic integration in the Eurasian Economic Union: The relevance of integration theories. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 32(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2023.2193877Bureau of National Statistics. (2026). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://stat.gov.kz/enBureau of National Statistics. (2026). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://stat.gov.kz/enCrozet, M., & Hinz, J. (2020). Friendly fire: The trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions. Economic Policy, 35(101), 97–146. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eiaa006Crozet, M., & Hinz, J. (2020). Friendly fire: The trade impact of the Russia sanctions and counter-sanctions. Economic Policy, 35(101), 97–146. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eiaa006Drezner, D. W. (2003). The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization, 57(3), 643–659. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303573052Drezner, D. W. (2003). The hidden hand of economic coercion. International Organization, 57(3), 643–659. doi: 10.1017/S0020818303573052Early, B. R. (2015). Busted sanctions: Explaining why economic sanctions fail. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780804794329Early, B. R. (2015). Busted sanctions: Explaining why economic sanctions fail. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780804794329Early, B. R., & Peksen, D. (2019). Searching in the shadows: The impact of economic sanctions on informal economies. Political Research Quarterly, 72(4), 821–834. doi: 10.1177/1065912918806412Early, B. R., & Peksen, D. (2019). Searching in the shadows: The impact of economic sanctions on informal economies. Political Research Quarterly, 72(4), 821–834. doi: 10.1177/1065912918806412Felbermayr, G., Kirilakha, A., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2020). The global sanctions data base. European Economic Review, 129, 103561. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103561Felbermayr, G., Kirilakha, A., Syropoulos, C., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2020). The global sanctions data base. European Economic Review, 129, 103561. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103561Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311Haidar, J. I. (2017). Sanctions and export deflection: Evidence from Iran. Economic Policy, 32(90), 319–355. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix002Haidar, J. I. (2017). Sanctions and export deflection: Evidence from Iran. Economic Policy, 32(90), 319–355. doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix002Hudson, V. (2022). The impact of Russian soft power in Kazakhstan: Creating an enabling environment for cooperation between Nur-Sultan and Moscow. Journal of Political Power, 15(3), 469–494. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2022.2127280Hudson, V. (2022). The impact of Russian soft power in Kazakhstan: Creating an enabling environment for cooperation between Nur-Sultan and Moscow. Journal of Political Power, 15(3), 469–494. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2022.2127280Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3<sup>rd</sup> ed.). Peterson Institute for International Economics.Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3<sup>rd</sup> ed.). Peterson Institute for International Economics.Ibrayeva, A., Kozhirova, S., Nechayeva, Y., Shukyzhanova, A., & Zhanbulatova, R. (2023). Cross-border geopolitics: Ambivalent aspect of the border issue in relationship between Kazakhstan and Russia. Comparative Strategy, 42(4), 587–601. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2023.2219196Ibrayeva, A., Kozhirova, S., Nechayeva, Y., Shukyzhanova, A., & Zhanbulatova, R. (2023). Cross-border geopolitics: Ambivalent aspect of the border issue in relationship between Kazakhstan and Russia. Comparative Strategy, 42(4), 587–601. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2023.2219196Kemme, D. M., Akhmetzaki, Y., & Mukhamediyev, B. M. (2021). The effects of the Eurasian Economic Union on regional foreign direct investment and implications for growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(5), 643–660. doi: 10.1080/09638199.2021.1896769Kemme, D. M., Akhmetzaki, Y., & Mukhamediyev, B. M. (2021). The effects of the Eurasian Economic Union on regional foreign direct investment and implications for growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(5), 643–660. doi: 10.1080/09638199.2021.1896769Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Eurasian regionalism and Russia’s war against Ukraine: Consequences for the EAEU and Kazakhstan. Russian Analytical Digest, 287, 2–6. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000577719Libman, A., & Obydenkova, A. (2022). Eurasian regionalism and Russia’s war against Ukraine: Consequences for the EAEU and Kazakhstan. Russian Analytical Digest, 287, 2–6. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000577719Makhmutova, E. (2019). Sanctions against Russia and their impact on the Eurasian Economic Union. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(3), 99–116. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-03-05Makhmutova, E. (2019). Sanctions against Russia and their impact on the Eurasian Economic Union. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(3), 99–116. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-03-05Morgan, T. C., Syropoulos, C., & Yotov, Y. V. (2023). Economic sanctions: Evolution, consequences, and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 3–30. doi: 10.1257/jep.37.1.3Morgan, T. C., Syropoulos, C., & Yotov, Y. V. (2023). Economic sanctions: Evolution, consequences, and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(1), 3–30. doi: 10.1257/jep.37.1.3Myrzakhmetova, A., Panfilova, E., & Turgel, I. (2019). Cross-border cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia. In I. Turgel, A. Pereverzeva, & J. Karbach (Eds.), Economic and social development : Book of proceedings (pp. 115–122). Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency.Myrzakhmetova, A., Panfilova, E., & Turgel, I. (2019). Cross-border cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia. In I. Turgel, A. Pereverzeva, & J. Karbach (Eds.), Economic and social development : Book of proceedings (pp. 115–122). Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency.National Bank. (2026). Net position on direct investment according to the directional principle. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/116049National Bank. (2026). Net position on direct investment according to the directional principle. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/116049Pape, R. A. (1997). Why do economic sanctions not work. International Security, 22(2), 90–136. doi: 10.1162/isec.22.2.90Pape, R. A. (1997). Why do economic sanctions not work. International Security, 22(2), 90–136. doi: 10.1162/isec.22.2.90Pomerlyan, E., & Belitski, M. (2024). Regional integration and economic performance: Evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 65(5), 627–655. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2163414Pomerlyan, E., & Belitski, M. (2024). Regional integration and economic performance: Evidence from the Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 65(5), 627–655. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2022.2163414Sedrakyan, G. S. (2022). Economic sanctions against Russia: How will the neighboring transition economies be affected? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(4), 843–861. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.09.004Sedrakyan, G. S. (2022). Economic sanctions against Russia: How will the neighboring transition economies be affected? Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(4), 843–861. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.09.004Yakovenko, N. V., Rakhimbekova, Z. S., Azarova, N. A., Klimova, T. B., Ashimova, A. A., Tsoy, M. Y., Semenova, L. V., & Yelubayeva, Z. M. (2026). Structural contrasts and potential of complementarity of national innovation systems of Russia and Kazakhstan in the context of EAEU integration. Sustainability, 18(4), 1753. doi: 10.3390/su18041753Yakovenko, N. V., Rakhimbekova, Z. S., Azarova, N. A., Klimova, T. B., Ashimova, A. A., Tsoy, M. Y., Semenova, L. V., & Yelubayeva, Z. M. (2026). Structural contrasts and potential of complementarity of national innovation systems of Russia and Kazakhstan in the context of EAEU integration. Sustainability, 18(4), 1753. doi: 10.3390/su18041753

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.