Organizational Ambidexterity and Resilience: Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v67i4.315
Abstract
Businesses are still learning how to cope with system stress that overwhelmed the whole world during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2007-2008, COVID-19 pandemics in 2020, and other crises. Thereby, enterprises will be able not only to deal with uncertainty, that is becoming a “new standard”, but to benefit from it. As a result, the focus of the leaders has shifted from short-term, operational continuity to resilience. Earlier research suggested organizational ambidexterity as one of its antecedents and key factors for firms’ long-term survival and prosperity. However, little is known about the leadership role in ambidexterity literature. Most of the previous research were conducted in developed countries and placed emphasis on conceptual studies. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to statistically examine the moderating effect of transformational leadership in the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and resilience using a sample of 323 usable questionnaires gathered from more than 80 Kazakhstani firms. The results of regression analysis statistically confirmed that organizational ambidexterity positively and significantly correlated with resilience. Further, results revealed the moderating role of transformational leadership in the linkage above. The study came up with an unexpected finding that transformational leadership directly and significantly influences resilience. The primary practical implication of this study is that leaders realize the feasibility of their investments in developing ambidextrous capabilities in their organizations and, particularly, senior management, since it was statistically proven in this research that it leads to higher resilience.
About the Author
Saya Zhaxylyk
KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD candidate, Senior Lecturer, Email: saya.zhaxylyk@kimep.kz
References
1. Abdrassilova, G. S., Murzagaliyeva, E. T., & Kuc, S. (2021). Mausoleum of Khoja Akhmed Yassawi as the element of regional identity formation in modern architecture of Kazakhstan. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(1), 127-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.21533/pen.v9i1.1783
2. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalı (7. Baskı). Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 9(1), 127-138.
3. Anholt, S. (2007). What is competitive identity? In Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions (pp. 1-23). London, Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627727
4. Dastgerdi, A. S., & De Luca, G. (2018). The riddles of historic urban quarters inscription on the UNESCO world heritage list. International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(1), 152-163. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1108602
5. Garda, B. & Sartayeva, Z. (2022). Urban Tourism: Swot Analysis of Turkestan in Terms of Tourism Potential. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 8(102), 2864-2871. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/sssj.64576
6. Florek, M., & Janiszewska, K. (2013). Defining place brand identity: methods and determinants of application. Actual Problems of the Economy, 12, 543-553. Available online: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2013_12_68
7. Kall, J. (2001). Silna marka: istota i kreowanie. Warszawa:Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
8. Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. London, Kogan page publishers.
9. Kavaratzis, M. (2007). City marketing: The past, the present and some unresolved issues. Geography compass, 1(3), 695-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00034.x
10. Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G. J. (2005). City branding: an effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 96(5), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990056
11. Kuralbayev, A., Sevim, B., Myrzaliev, B., & Abdybekov, S. (2017). Tourism Perception of Turkestan Residents and Their Attitudes Towards Tourism. Social Sciences and Humanities Series, 5(315), 10-19.
12. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2007). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of brand management, 9, 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
13. Oguztimur, S., & Akturan, U. (2016). Synthesis of city branding literature (1988–2014) as a research domain. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(4), 357-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2054
14. Pike, S. (2009). Destination brand positions of a competitive set of near-home destinations. Tourism management, 30(6), 857-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.12.007
15. Pustu, Y. (2006). Kuresellesme Surecinde Kent “Antik Site’den DunyaKentine” Sayıstay Dergisi. Sayıstay Baskanlıgı, 60, 129-151
16. Riza, M., Doratli, N., & Fasli, M. (2012). City branding and identity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.091
17. Sabirova, R.K., Mukasheva, A.D., & Tairova, A.Z., (2019). Development of branding in the Kazakhstan market. Economics: the strategy and practice, 14(1), 163-180.
18. Sadullaeva, A. P., & Baizhaksynova, G. K. (2021). On the city brand development: city style as a city brand dimension. Turan University Bulletin, 3, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2021-1-3-57-64
19. Saltik, A. (1995). Socio-economic foundations of voluntary organizations in contemporary societies. Proceedings of the Voluntary Organizations Conference, 28-29.
20. Sarioglu, S. (2005). The effects of globalization on cities: World cities and the case of Istanbul. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.
21. Simeon, R. (2006). A conceptual model linking brand building strategies and Japanese popular culture. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(5), 463-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610682863
22. Zhakenova, K. A., & Kairova, A. A. (2013). Strategic vectors of the country brand: theory and practice of foreign countries. Economics: the Strategy and Practice, 1, 33-40.
Review
For citations:
Zhaxylyk S. Organizational Ambidexterity and Resilience: Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2023;67(4):63–73. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v67i4.315
Views:
26
JATS XML
Email this article 