Regional Differences in Social Protection in Kazakhstan: The Role of Payment Levels and Coverage
https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-53-70
Abstract
Regional differentiation of social protection remains one of the key problems of ensuring balanced socio-economic development and reducing inequality.
The aim of the study is to assess inter-regional differences in the level of social protection in Kazakhstan and to determine the contribution of the level of payments and coverage of the population to the formation of these differences.
The empirical base consists of official data from the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period 2014–2024, covering 17 regions. The research methodology includes the standardization of indicators (Z-score), their time averaging, the construction of an integral index of social protection, cluster analysis with the determination of the optimal number of clusters based on Gap Statistical, as well as multidimensional scaling using Euclidean metrics. The results showed the presence of stable regional differentiation: the values of the integral index range from –0,68 in the North Kazakhstan region to 0,95 in the Turkestan region. High values were also recorded in the East Kazakhstan region (0,72) and Almaty (0,69). Cluster analysis revealed five groups of regions that differ in the combination of payment levels and coverage, which confirms the heterogeneity of the functioning of the social protection system. The results show that an increase in payments has a more significant impact on the level of social protection than an expansion of coverage with a low level of funding, which should be taken into account when shaping regional social policy.
About the Authors
S. S. RakymzhanovaKazakhstan
Saltanat S. Rakymzhanova, Master of Economic Sciences, Senior Lecturer
Almaty
P. B. Issakhova
Kazakhstan
Parida B. Issakhova, Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor
Almaty
N. M. Sabitova
Russian Federation
Nadiya M. Sabitova, Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor
Kazan
References
1. Aliyeva, B., Mukhamedyarova, L., Markhayeva, B., Telagussova, E., & Ydyrys, Y. (2025). Analysis of Employment Policy Effectiveness in Kazakhstan: Regional Clustering Approach. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 69(2), 141–157. doi: 10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.508
2. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
3. Atkinson, T. (2015). What can be done about inequality? Juncture, 22(1), 32–41. doi: 10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00834.x
4. Barrett, C. B., & Carter, M. R. (2013). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: Empirical and policy implications. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 976–990. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2013.785527
5. Barrientos, A. (2016). Justice-based social assistance. Global Social Policy, 16(2), 151–165. doi: 10.1177/1468018116633576
6. Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., Schmidt, T., & Pellerano, L. (2016). Cash transfers: what does the evidence say. A rigorous review of programme impact and the role of design and implementation features. London: ODI, 1(7), 1. Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/111531529868058319-0160022017/original/Day39am10749.pdf
7. Bureau of National Statistics. (2025). Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://stat.gov.kz/en
8. Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Financing the welfare state in times of extreme crisis: public support for health care spending during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1977375
9. Decancq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2013). Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing : An overview. Econometric Reviews, 32(1), 7–34. doi: 10.1080/07474938.2012.690641
10. Devereux, S. (2021). Social protection responses to COVID-19 in Africa. Global Social Policy, 21(3), 421–447. doi: 10.1177/14680181211021260
11. Devereux, S., Masset, E., Sabates-Wheeler, R., Samson, M., Rivas, A. M., & Te Lintelo, D. (2017). The targeting effectiveness of social transfers. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9(2), 162–211. doi: 10.1080/19439342.2017.1305981
12. Fiszbein, A., Schady, N., Ferreira, F. H., Grosh, M., Keleher, N., Olinto, P., & Skoufias, E. (2009). Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/57662378-4c03-5324-987c-39cab33bd4dc/content
13. Gugushvili, D., & Laenen, T. (2021). Two decades after Korpi and Palme’s “paradox of redistribution”: What have we learned so far and where do we take it from here? Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(2), 112–127. doi: 10.1017/ics.2020.24
14. Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2018). Universal basic incomes versus targeted transfers: Anti-poverty programs in developing countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(4), 201–226. doi: 10.1257/jep.32.4.201
15. Hanlon, J. (2004). It is possible to just give money to the poor. Development and Change, 35(2), 375–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00356.x
16. Immervoll, H., & Richardson, L. (2011). Redistribution policy and inequality reduction in OECD countries: what has changed in two decades? (No. 571). LIS Working Paper Series. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/95386
17. Kasteng, F., Settumba, S., Källander, K., & Vassall, A. (2015). Valuing the work of unpaid community health workers and exploring the incentives to volunteering in rural Africa. Health Policy and Planning, 31(2), 205–216. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv042
18. Koehler, G. (2011). Transformative social protection: reflections on South Asian policy experiences. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 96–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00280.x
19. Kuanova, L., Bekbossinova, A., & Abdykadyr, T. (2023). Assessment of the sustainable development of regions: The case of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 67(3), 122–135. doi: 10.47703/ejebs.v3i67.310
20. Levy, S. (2009). Progress against Poverty: Sustaining Mexico’s PROGRESA-Oportunidades Program. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(3), 594–597. doi: 10.1086/596600
21. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016). On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 983–1003. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0998-2
22. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building (EUR 21682 EN; JRC31473). European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Retrieved April 15, 2026 from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC31473
23. Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2019). Welfare and redistributive effects of social assistance in the Global South. Population and Development Review, 45(S1), 3–22. doi: 10.1111/padr.12308
24. Norton, A., Conway, T., & Foster, M. (2002). Social protection: defining the field of action and policy. Development Policy Review, 20(5), 541–567. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00189
25. Schmitt, C. (2020). The coverage of social protection in the Global South. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29(1), 6–19. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12374
26. Slater, R. (2011). Cash transfers, social protection and poverty reduction. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(3), 250–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00801.x
27. Tuzubekova, M., Kazizova, G., Sarybaeva, I., & Zhunussova, G. (2022). Social policy of the state and the role of state programs in solving the problems of social protection of the population. Economic Consultant, 1(37), 61–71. doi: 10.46224/ecoc.2022.1.5
28. Uskelenova, A. T., & Nikiforova, N. (2024). Regional development of Kazakhstan: Theoretical premises and reality. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(3), 12616. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12616
29. Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. (2021). Trends in public support for welfare spending: how the economy matters. British Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 163–180. doi: 10.1017/S0007123419000103
Review
For citations:
Rakymzhanova S.S., Issakhova P.B., Sabitova N.M. Regional Differences in Social Protection in Kazakhstan: The Role of Payment Levels and Coverage. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2026;70(2):53-70. https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-53-70
JATS XML








