Analysis of Employment Policy Effectiveness in Kazakhstan: Regional Clustering Approach
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.508
Abstract
Effective evaluation of public employment programs in transition economies requires analytical frameworks that can address institutional complexity, spatial disparities, and inconsistent performance monitoring. The purpose of this article is to conduct a state audit of the implementation of the “Enbek” employment program in Kazakhstan from 2017 to 2021, taking into account both spatial and institutional aspects. The study employs a combination of pre- and post-analysis, regional comparative assessment, hierarchical clustering, and benchmarking against official unemployment targets to assess policy coherence and execution. The empirical base comprises panel data from 17 regions of Kazakhstan, covering the period from 2014 to 2024. The results demonstrate the achievement of the national target for the unemployment rate (<4.8%) and a decrease in the share of informal employment from 25% to 12.5%. However, pronounced regional imbalances and institutional constraints remain. The findings of the cluster analysis reveal three regional typologies reflecting disparities in labor market structure and policy responsiveness. Regions with developed labor infrastructure exhibit relative stability, while peripheral regions remain characterized by persistent structural misalignments. However, the results suggest that current evaluation methods are insufficient to fully assess the effectiveness of employment programs across different regions. Future research should focus on developing indicators for regional inclusivity, integrating program sustainability assessments into strategic planning, and institutionalising the adaptation of public employment tools.
About the Authors
Baglan AliyevaKazakhstan
PhD, Senior Lecturer, Email: baglan_a74@mail.ru
Liya Mukhamedyarova
Kazakhstan
PhD student, Email: idrissova.ar@gmail.com
Bayanslu Markhayeva
Kazakhstan
Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Email: markhaeva@mail.ru
Elmira Telagussova
Kazakhstan
PhD, Senior Lecturer, Email: eltel7@mail.ru
Yerkebulan Ydyrys
Kazakhstan
Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Senior Lecturer, Email: erkebulan_idiris@mail.ru
References
1. Bekniyazova, D. S., Kaliskarova, A. Z., Baiburina, D. O., & Reshina, G. A. (2021). Methodological approaches to evaluating the quality of state programs of the Republic of Kazakhstan (on the example of the employment sector). Bulletin of the Innovative University of Eurasia, (3), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.37788/2021-3%2F35-43
2. Bhuiyan, S. H., & Amagoh, F. (2011). Public sector reform in Kazakhstan: Issues and perspectives. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(3), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551111121356
3. Bredgaard, T., & Larsen, F. (2007). Implementing public employment policy: What happens when non‐public agencies take over? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(7/8), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710773863
4. Burchell, B., Sehnbruch, K., Piasna, A., & Agloni, N. (2014). The quality of employment and decent work: definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates. Cambridge journal of economics, 38(2), 459-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet067
5. Çoçka, K., Maxhelaku, A., & Rusi, I. (2017). Employment Policy and International Labour Standards. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 366 - 371. Retrieved June 5, 2025 https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/9704
6. Ha, B. (2005). System-based auditing and monitoring of government programs and projects. International Journal of Government Auditing, 32(4), 11- 14.
7. Heyes, J. (2011). Flexicurity, employment protection and the jobs crisis. Work, employment and society, 25(4), 642-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011419723
8. Inter-American Development Bank. (2016). Evaluating the impact of cluster development programs. Retrieved June 5, 2025 https://publications.iadb.org/en/evaluating-impact-cluster-development-programs
9. International Labour Organization. (2020). Global employment policy review 2020: Employment policies for inclusive structural transformation.
10. International Labour Organization. (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved June 5, 2025 https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40inst/documents/publication/wcms_865332.pdf
11. Juhász, R., & Lane, N. (2024). The political economy of industrial policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(4), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.4.27.
12. Kalyuzhnova, Y., & Nygaard, C. (2008). State governance evolution in resource-rich transition economies: An application to Russia and Kazakhstan. Energy Policy, 36(6), 1829-1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.035
13. Koliev, F. (2022). Promoting international labour standards: The ILO and national labour regulations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(2), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211027513
14. Liimatainen, K., Heikkilä, J., & Seppänen, V. (2008). A framework for evaluating compliance of public service development programs with government enterprise architecture. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 269-276.
15. Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Population of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2018). Gosudarstvennaya programma razvitiya produktivnoy zanyatosti i massovogo predprinimatelʹstva «Enbek» na 2017–2021 gody [State program for the development of productive employment and mass entrepreneurship “Enbek” for 2017–2021]. Retrieved June 5, 2025 https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1800000746
16. Mosher, J. S., & Trubek, D. M. (2003). Alternative approaches to governance in the EU: EU social policy and the European employment strategy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00411
17. Noch, M. Y., & Sonjaya, Y. (2024). Leveraging Governmental Auditing for Strategic Decision-Making and Policy Evaluation. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 2(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v2i1.286
18. Peck, L. R. (2004). Using cluster analysis in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 28(3), 270–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04266335
19. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2020). From evaluation to auditing and from programs to institutions: Causes and consequences of the decline of the program approach. Governance, 33(3), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12455
20. Rodrik, D. (2022). An industrial policy for good jobs. Hamilton Project—Policy proposal. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Retrieved June 5, 2025 https://www.hamiltonproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/20220928_THP_Proposal_Rodrik_GoodJobs.pdf
21. Rukevwe, E., & Nwachukwu, A. E. (2024). Implementation of International Labour Organization (ILO) Policy on Health, Safety and Welfare of Workers in Central Senatorial District, Delta State, 10(3), 1-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.802114
22. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1988). Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design. Journal of public policy, 8(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006851
23. Slobodianyk, Y., Shymon, S., & Adam, V. (2018). Compliance auditing in public administration: Ukrainian perspectives. Baltic journal of economic studies, 4(5), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-320-331
24. Standing, G. (2010). The international labour organization. New Political Economy, 15(2), 307-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563460903290961
25. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. Retrieved June 5, 2025 from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
26. Wilthagen, T., Tros, F., & Van Lieshout, H. (2004). Towards ‘flexicurity’? Balancing flexibility and security in EU Member States. European journal of social security, 6(2), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826270400600202
Review
For citations:
Aliyeva B., Mukhamedyarova L., Markhayeva B., Telagussova E., Ydyrys Ye. Analysis of Employment Policy Effectiveness in Kazakhstan: Regional Clustering Approach. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2025;69(2):141–157. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.508
JATS XML








