Scenario Analysis of Risks and Opportunities in Kazakhstan’s Industrial Transition to Carbon Neutrality
https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-1-19-35
Abstract
The transition to carbon neutrality represents a strategic imperative for large industrial companies in Kazakhstan in the context of global climate challenges and increasingly stringent environmental requirements. The purpose of this study is to develop an integrated risk and opportunity management framework for industrial decarbonization in Kazakhstan based on scenario modelling and expert assessment. The study uses a mixed methodological approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. The empirical basis of the study was made up of sectoral data on greenhouse gas emissions in Kazakhstan’s industry for 2015-2024, official statistics from government agencies, corporate non-financial reports, as well as the results of 32 semi-structured expert interviews with representatives of industrial companies, government regulators and international organizations. The results of the study show that Kazakhstan’s industrial CO2 emissions increased 18.1% from 224.7 million tonnes (2015) to 265.4 million tons (2024), with metallurgy accounting for 35.9%, energy 28.1%, oil and gas 22.8%, and chemicals 13.4%. Scenario analysis shows that under the business-as-usual scenario, emissions could increase to 322.5 million tons of CO2 by 2050, while the moderate scenario reduces emissions to 102.3 million tons (55% compared to 2024), and the ambitious scenario to 35 million tons (-84%). This research extends sustainability theory by demonstrating how to transition economy characteristics-legacy infrastructure, resource dependence, institutional capacity-shape decarbonization pathways, providing actionable insights for climate policy formulation and corporate strategy in resource-rich developing nations.
About the Authors
Lena Khuanysh
Esil University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD student
Astana
Zhanar Dauletkhanova
Turan-Astana University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Doctor of Finance
Astana
Aliya Yerniyazova
NAO West Kazakhstan University named after M. Utemisov
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD, Associate Professor
Uralsk
References
1. Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442508
2. Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
3. Amini, A., Mirkhani, N., Pourfard, P. P., Ashjaee, M., & Khodkar, M. A. (2015). Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle. Energy, 86, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.113
4. Aubakirova, G. M., Isatayeva, F. M., Mazhitova, S. K., & Togaibaeva, L. I. (2023). Dekarbonizatsiya gorno-metallurgicheskogo sektora: opyt Kazakhstana [Decarbonization of mining and steel sectors: experience of Kazakhstan]. Bulletin of “Turan” University, 4, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-4-54-69 (In Russ.)
5. Bataille, C., Åhman, M., Neuhoff, K., Nilsson, L. J., Fischedick, M., Lechtenböhmer, S., Solano-Rodriquez, B., Denis-Ryan, A., Stiebert, S., Waisman, H., Sartor, O., & Rahbar, S. (2018). A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 960–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107
6. Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019). Developing guidance for implementing border carbon adjustments. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey020
7. Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. (2020). Divergent ESG ratings. Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.1.175
8. Fankhauser, S., Smith, S. M., Allen, M., Axelsson, K., Hale, T., Hepburn, C., Kendall, J. M., Khosla, R., Lezaun, J., Mitchell-Larson, E., Obersteiner, M., Rajamani, L., Rickaby, R., Seddon, N., & Wetzer, T. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w
9. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
10. Fatica, S., & Panzica, R. (2021). Green bonds as a tool against climate change? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2688–2701. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2771
11. Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
12. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
13. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
14. Healy, N., & Barry, J. (2017). Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy, 108, 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014
15. IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15
16. Kahn, M. E., Mohaddes, K., Ng, R. N. C., Pesaran, M. H., Raissi, M., & Yang, J. (2021). Long-term macroeconomic effects of climate change: A cross-country analysis. Energy Economics, 104, 105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105624
17. Karatayev, M., & Clarke, M. L. (2016). A review of current energy systems and green energy potential in Kazakhstan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.078
18. Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
19. Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., Merabet, A., Ghenai, C., Abo-Khalil, A. G., & Salameh, T. (2023). The role of biofuels for sustainable microgrids: A path towards carbon neutrality and the green economy. Heliyon, 9, e13407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13407
20. Kobashi, T., Zusman, E., Taniguchi, M., & Yarime, M. (2025). Facilitating a carbon neutral transition in Kyoto: Initiatives on rooftop photovoltaics integrated with electric vehicles. Technology in Society, 80, 102774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102774
21. Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., et al. (2019). Sustainability transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
22. Lioubimtseva, E., & Henebry, G. M. (2009). Climate and environmental change in arid Central Asia: Impacts, vulnerability, and adaptations. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(11), 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.04.022
23. McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014
24. Mehling, M. A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law, 113(3), 433–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.22
25. Montalvo, S., Vielma, S., Borja, R., Huiliñir, C., & Guerrero, L. (2018). Increase in biogas production in anaerobic sludge digestion by combining aerobic hydrolysis and addition of metallic wastes. Renewable Energy, 123, 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.004
26. Munawer, M. E. (2018). Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and postcombustion wastes. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.007
27. Overland, I., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). The misallocation of climate research funding. Energy Research & Social Science, 62, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101349
28. Pahle, M., Burtraw, D., Flachsland, C., et al. (2018). Sequencing climate policy stringency. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0287-6
29. President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Strategiya dostizheniya uglerodnoy neytralnosti Respubliki Kazakhstan do 2060 goda [Strategy for achieving carbon neutrality of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2060] (Presidential Decree No. 121). Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2300000121
30. Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Updated nationally determined contribution of the Republic of Kazakhstan [Nationally determined contribution]. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved December 15, 2025 from https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2023-06/12updated%20NDC%20KAZ_Gov%20Decree313_19042023_en_cover%20page.pdf
31. Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., Luderer, G., Emmerling, J., Gernaat, D., Fujimori, S., Strefler, J., Hasegawa, T., Marangoni, G., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Doelman, J., Drouet, L., Edmonds, J., Fricko, O., Harmsen, M., Havlík, P., Humpenöder, F., Stehfest, E., & Tavoni, M. (2018). Scenarios limiting global temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 325–332.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3
32. Sansyzbayev, A. B., Mukhametkaliyeva, M. A., & Mukan, M. M. (2025). Analysis of carbon storage and economic value of different land use types in Kazakhstan (2001–2020). Central Asian Economic Review, 2(161), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.52821/2789-4401-2025-2-79-89
33. Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon lock-in: Types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
34. Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., Amir, S., Geels, F. W., Hirsh, R., Medina, L. R., Miller, C., Palavicino, C. A., Phadke, R., Ryghaug, M., Schot, J., Silvast, A., Stephens, J., Stirling, A., Turnheim, B., van der Vleuten, E., van Lente, H., & Yearley, S. (2020). Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617
35. Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2020). Planetary just transition? Earth System Governance, 6, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100065
36. Tawalbeh, M., Al-Othman, A., Kafiah, F., Abdelsalam, E., Almomani, F., & Alkasrawi, M. (2021). Environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic systems: A critical review of recent progress and future outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 759, 143528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143528
37. Turekulova, D., Shukeyev, U., Ryumkina, I., & Ryumkin, S. (2023). Carbon market of Kazakhstan: Element of the strategy for environmental efficiency of the use of national resources. Vestnik KazUEFiMT, 4(53), 284–294. DOI 10.52260/2304-7216.2023.4(53).34
38. Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
39. Vakulchuk, R., & Overland, I. (2021). Central Asia is a missing link in analyses of critical materials for the global clean energy transition. One Earth, 4(12), 1678–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.012
40. Wang, Z., Kong, Y., & Li, W. (2022). Review on the development of China’s natural gas industry in the background of “carbon neutrality”. Natural Gas Industry B, 9, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2021.08.021
41. Zhao, X., Ma, X., Chen, B., Shang, Y., & Song, M. (2022). Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 176, 105959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105959
42. Zou, C., Xiong, B., Xue, H., Zheng, D., Ge, Z., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., Pan, S., & Wu, S. (2021). The role of new energy in carbon neutral. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 48(2), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60039-3
Review
For citations:
Khuanysh L., Dauletkhanova Zh., Yerniyazova A. Scenario Analysis of Risks and Opportunities in Kazakhstan’s Industrial Transition to Carbon Neutrality. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2026;70(1):19-35. https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-1-19-35
Views:
338
JATS XML
Email this article 