Capital Income and Growth Dynamics as Determinants of Income Distribution:Evidence from Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v69i4.597
Abstract
Given the high dependence of Kazakhstan's economy on capital-intensive industries, the importance of analyzing income distribution and the factors that determine the strengthening or weakening of economic inequality is increasing. The purpose of this study is to analyze the dynamics of income distribution in Kazakhstan by comparing the rates of return on capital and economic growth. The research methodology is based on Piketty's conceptual framework and includes constructing integral indicators of return on capital (r-index) and economic growth (g-index) from normalized macroeconomic and industry indicators. The empirical base of the study comprises official statistical data from the Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period 2010-2024. The results showed that in 11 of the 15 analyzed years, economic growth outpaced the return on capital (g > r), indicating a more balanced income distribution. During 2010-2016, the gap between the g-index and the r-index remained positive, peaking at +0.42, reflecting the dominance of economic growth over capital incomes. In 2017-2018 and in 2020. The return on capital exceeded economic growth, with the difference reaching -0.08, indicating an increase in income inequality and income concentration in capital-intensive sectors. The directions of future research relate to the possibility of using the r–g approach to monitor the distributional effects of macroeconomic policy, as well as to expanding the analysis at the regional level and including institutional factors of income redistribution.
About the Authors
Magbat SpanovAinura Alibekova
Kenzhegali Sagadiev University of International Business, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD candidate, Email: ainura_alibekova97@mail.ru
Gulnar Ospanakunovna
Almaty Technological University, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Email: bugub@mail.ru
Saban Celik
Izmir Kâtip Celebi University, Izmir
Turkey
Turkey
PhD, Associate Professor, Email: saban.celik@ikcu.edu.tr
References
1. Abatemarco, A., Lagomarsino, E., & Spiganti, A. (2025). Rising Income Inequality and the Impact of r-g in the United States. Review of Income and Wealth, 71(1), e70000. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70000
2. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European economic review, 40(6), 1203-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5
3. Ashirbekova, L., Sansyzbaeva, K., Askerov, A., & Grabowska, M. (2023). Incomes of the Population of Kazakhstan: Differentiation and Forecast. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 67(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v2i67.289
4. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? In Inequality. Harvard University Press. http://digamo.free.fr/atkinson15.pdf
5. Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. The Quarterly journal of economics, 135(2), 645-709. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa004
6. Bengtsson, E., & Waldenström, D. (2018). Capital shares and income inequality: Evidence from the long run. The Journal of Economic History, 78(3), 712-743. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050718000347
7. Behringer, J., & Van Treeck, T. (2018). Income distribution and the current account. Journal of International Economics, 114, 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.06.006
8. Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Yurchyk, H. (2020). Impact of income distribution on social and economic well-being of the state. Sustainability, 12(1), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
9. Checchi, D., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2008). Labour market institutions and income inequality. Economic Policy, 23(56), 602-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2008.00209.x
10. Cowell, F. A., & Flachaire, E. (2024). Inequality measurement and the rich: why inequality increased more than we thought. Review of Income and Wealth, 70(2), 254-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12638
11. Davis, G. A. (2020). Large-sample evidence of income inequality in resource-rich nations. Mineral Economics, 33(1-2), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-019-00207-1
12. De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020). The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. The Quarterly journal of economics, 135(2), 561-644. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz041
13. Franke, U. (2021). Rawls’s original position and algorithmic fairness. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1803-1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00488-x
14. Green, J. E. (2013). Rawls and the forgotten figure of the most advantaged: In defense of reasonable envy toward the superrich. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000585
15. Gökçekuyu, E. (2024). John Rawls approach toward fair redistribution of resources. Ankara Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14), 95-104. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4214927
16. Iacono, R., & Palagi, E. (2023). A micro perspective on r > g. Economica, 90(358), 531-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12464
17. Jackson, T., & Victor, P. A. (2021). Confronting inequality in the “new normal”: Hyper‐capitalism, proto‐socialism, and post‐pandemic recovery. Sustainable Development, 29(3), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2196
18. Jakurti, E. (2025). A Tale of Two Rates: Return on Capital, Economic Growth, and Wealth Concentration in the Long Run. Review of Political Economy, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2025.2492268
19. KazMunayGas National Company JSC. (2017). Annual report of JSC NC “KazMunayGas” for 2017. Kazakhstan Stock Exchange. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://kase.kz/files/emitters/KMGZ/kmgzp_2017_rus.pdf
20. Ladykova, T., Ivanova, T., Streltsov, V., Sayganov, A., & Ladykova, E. (2023). Methodological Approach to Assessment Socio-Economic Development of the Chuvash Republic (Subject of the Russian Federation). Economies, 11(7), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070176
21. Levin, J., & Bigsten, A. (2000). Growth, income distribution, and poverty: A review. rapport nr.: Working Papers in Economics, 32. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2853
22. Mechling, G., Miller, S., & Konecny, R. (2017). Do Piketty and Saez misstate income inequality? Critiquing the critiques. Review of Political Economy, 29(1), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2017.1255439
23. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Harvard University Press. http://pinguet.free.fr/branko16.pdf
24. OECD. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/533411815016
25. Peterson, E. W. F. (2017). The role of population in economic growth. Sage Open, 7(4), 2158244017736094. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017736094
26. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://dowbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/14Thomas-Piketty.pdf
27. Piketty, T., & Zucman, G. (2014). Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries 1700–2010. The Quarterly journal of economics, 129(3), 1255-1310. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju018
28. Piketty, T. (2015). Putting distribution back at the center of economics: Reflections on capital in the twenty-first century. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(1), 67-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.1.67
29. Piketty, T., Yang, L., & Zucman, G. (2019). Capital accumulation, private property, and rising inequality in China, 1978–2015. American Economic Review, 109(7), 2469-2496. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170973
30. Ramachandran, J., Chen, K. K., Subramanian, R., Yeoh, K. K., & Khong, K. W. (2018). Corporate governance and performance of REITs: A combined study of Singapore and Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(6/7), 586-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2016-1445
31. Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2020). The rise of income and wealth inequality in America: Evidence from distributional macroeconomic accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.4.3
32. Saipudin, S. (2024). The Relationship between Income Inequality and Economic Growth. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(4), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.59613/rx9waq73
33. Sakaki, S. (2017). Income distribution management to sustain long-term economic growth: does the equalization of income distribution contribute to long-term economic growth? Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 14(2), 363-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-017-0079-0
34. Sakaki, S. (2019). Equality in income and sustainability in economic growth: Agent-based simulations on OECD Data. Sustainability, 11(20), 5803. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205803
35. Schmid, G. (1993). Equality and efficiency in the labor market: Towards a socio-economic theory of cooperation in the globalizing economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 22(1), 31-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-5357(93)90005-6
36. Sen, A. (2000). Social justice and the distribution of income. Handbook of income distribution, 1, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0056(00)80004-4
37. Shaikh, A. (2017). Income distribution, econophysics and Piketty. Review of Political Economy, 29(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1205295
38. Stirati, A. (2017). Wealth, capital and the theory of distribution: Some implications for Piketty’s analysis. Review of Political Economy, 29(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2016.1237819
39. Strauss, D., & Ventosa-Santaularia, D. (2023). Does RG cause wealth inequality? The case of the United States. Estudios Económicos (México, DF), 38(2), 183-224. https://doi.org/10.24201/ee.v38i2.441
40. TASS. (2016, December 7). Kashagan vyshel na proektnuyu moshchnost’ dobychi nefti [Kashagan reached its design oil production capacity]. TASS Russian News Agency. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://tass.ru/ekonomika/3849047
41. Timmer, C. P. (2000). The macro dimensions of food security: economic growth, equitable distribution, and food price stability. Food policy, 25(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00007-5
42. Turchekenova, R. A., Zhanseitov, A. T., & Rakhimzhanova, R. A. (2021). The relationship between salary levels and economic convergence in Kazakhstan. Buketov Business Review, 104(4), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.31489/2021Ec4/101-107
43. UNDP. (2025a). Human Development Report 2025. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2025reporten.pdf
44. UNDP. (2025b). Human Development Index (HDI): Data Center. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI
45. Van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., De Koster, W., & Manevska, K. (2010). ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374376
46. Vail, J. (2010). Decommodification and egalitarian political economy. Politics & Society, 38(3), 310-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210373069
47. World Bank. (2024). Kazakhstan: Strengthening Public Finance for Inclusive and Resilient Growth. Public Finance Review – Overview. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099057102282440191/idu18abfcc0a1106d14eee1ace011ff55c80e795
48. Zeinolla, S., Tleppayev, A., Kerimbayev, R., & Spankulova, L. (2025). The Role of Education in Reducing Income Inequality: A Regional Analysis of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies, 69(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v69i2.505
Review
For citations:
Spanov M., Alibekova A., Ospanakunovna G., Celik S. Capital Income and Growth Dynamics as Determinants of Income Distribution:Evidence from Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2025;69(4):119-134. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v69i4.597
Views:
62
JATS XML
Email this article 