Reduction of Inequality of Regions as a Factor of Sustainable Development: The Case of Western Macro-region of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i1.351
Abstract
The most critical Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the promotion of sustainable economic growth, the eradication of poverty, and the reduction of inequality within countries. The hypothesis of the study is the assumption that the achievement of the SDGs in the country depends on the reduction of socio-economic inequality in the West Kazakhstan regions, which includes four regions of the country: Mangistau, Atyrau, Aktobe, and West Kazakhstan. This formulation of the question is because earlier studies by the article's authors indicate a discrepancy between the level of social well-being of a given region and the actual contribution to the development of the country’s economy. The aim of the article is to study the dynamics and degree of socio-economic development inequality of the Western Kazakhstan region and to develop recommendations on measures of state regulation to reduce it. To achieve this goal, the methods of generalization, concretization, economic-statistical, index, and comparative analysis were used. The result was a system of indicators for measuring the level of socio-economic stability of regions, taking into account country specifics, a study of trends, and an assessment of the degree of inequality in the socio-economic development of the regions of Western Kazakhstan, and recommendations for improving regulatory methods to reduce regional disparities. The authorities can use the recommendations to make decisions on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the regions of Western Kazakhstan.
Keywords
About the Authors
Nailya NurlanovaKazakhstan
Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Email: n.k.nurlanova@gmail.com
Farida Alzhanova
Kazakhstan
Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Email: farida.alzhanova@gmail.com
Aizhan Tleuberdinova
Kazakhstan
Doc. Sc. (Econ.), Email: tleuberdinova@gmail.com
Makpal Bekturganova
Kazakhstan
PhD, Email: bekturganova.makpal@gmail.com
References
1. Bolcárová, P., & Kološta, S. (2015). Assessment of sustainable development in the EU 27 using aggregated SD index. Ecological Indicators, 48, 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.001
2. Bureau of National Statistics (2022). Available online: https://stat.gov.kz (Accessed on 20 October 2023).
3. Chelli, F. M., Ciommi, M., & Gigliarano, C. (2013). The index of sustainable economic welfare: a comparison of two Italian regions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.457
4. Cobb, J. B., & Daly, H.E. (1989). For the common good: redirecting the economy towards community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston, Beacon Press.
5. Cortinovis, N., & van Oort, F. (2015). Variety, economic growth and knowledge intensity of European regions: a spatial panel analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 55, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0680-2
6. Costanza, R., Fioramonti, L., & Kubiszewski, I. (2016). The UN sustainable development goals and the dynamics of well-being. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 59-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1231
7. Environmental Code (2021). Available online: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K2100000400 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
8. ESCAP (2015). Making growth more inclusive for sustainable development. Economic and Social Survey of Asia and Pacific 2015. Available online: https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Economic%20and%20Social%20Survey%20of%20Asia%20and%20the%20Pacific%202015.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2023).
9. Glinskiy, V., Serga, L., Novikov, A., Litvintseva, G., & Bulkina, A. (2017). Investigation of Correlation between the Regions Sustainability and Territorial Differentiation. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.041
10. Harari, Y.V. (2019). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. New-York, Random House Publishing Group.
11. Haughton, G. & Counsell, D. (2004). Regions and sustainable development: regional planning matters. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00115.x
12. Ifzal, A., & Hyun, H.S. (2007). Measuring inclusive growth. Asian Development Review, 24 (1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0116110507000024
13. Jeffrey, K. (2019) Relationship between economic freedom and inclusive growth: a dynamic panel analysis for Sub‑Saharan African countries. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 21, 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-019-00076-y
14. Lee, N. (2018) Inclusive Growth in cities: A sympathetic critique. Regional Studies, 25, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1476753
15. Monitoring of the Sustainable development goals until 2030 (2016). Available: https://stat.gov.kz/ru/sustainable-development-goals (accessed on 20 October 2023).
16. Nurlanova, N., Alzhanova, F., Saparbek, N., & Dnishev, F. (2023). Inclusive Development: Assessment of regional Inequality in Kazakhstan and Measures to reduce it. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 734-743. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.65
17. OECD (2016). Inclusive Growth in Cities Campaign: A Roadmap for Action. The New York proposal for inclusive growth in cities. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/inclusive-growth/about/inclusive-cities-campaign (accessed on 20 October 2023).
18. Panzera, D., & Postiglione, P. (2022) The impact of regional inequality on economic growth: a spatial econometric approach. Regional Studies, 56(5), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1910228
19. Raheem, I.D., Isah, K.O., & Adedeji, A.A. (2018) Inclusive growth, human capital development and natural resource rent in SSA. Economic Change and Restructuring, 51 (2), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-016-9193-y
20. Ranieri, R., & Ramos, A. R. (2013). Inclusive growth: Building up a concept. Washington, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. Available online: https://ipcig.org/sites/default/files/pub/en/IPCWorkingPaper104.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2023).
21. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available online: www.stiglitz-sen- fitoussi.fr (accessed on 20 October 2023).
22. Tian, L., Wang, H. H., & Chen, Y. (2010). Spatial externalities in China regional economic growth. China Economic Review, 21(3), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.05.006
23. UN (2007). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. Available online: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2023).
24. UN (2015). Paris agreement. Available online: https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2023).
25. UNDP (2015). Global Goals for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals (accessed on 20 October 2023)
Review
For citations:
Nurlanova N., Alzhanova F., Tleuberdinova A., Bekturganova M. Reduction of Inequality of Regions as a Factor of Sustainable Development: The Case of Western Macro-region of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2024;68(1):102–113. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i1.351
JATS XML








