Preview

Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies

Advanced search

Green energy project management: applying industry-specific risk assessment models

https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.406

Abstract

By reducing reliance on fossil fuels, green energy projects mitigate climate change by lowering carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. They push governments and society to transition to renewable energy production by implementing high-risk green energy projects more effectively. This study evaluates how risk management processes affect the efficiency of green projects in Kazakhstan, identifying critical risk management processes that can increase their success. The methodology is based on data collected from 66 experts in Kazakhstan's green energy sector. Using multilinear regression analysis, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) standard was applied to evaluate the relationship between risk management processes and project efficiency dimensions. The findings show a positive correlation between cost overrun and project performance with the implementation of risk management processes. The statistical significance levels underscore the importance of these findings. The lack of statistical significance for schedule overrun, combined with the low rate of qualitative risk analysis and monitoring among local managers, highlights a deficiency in proactive risk management, leaving projects vulnerable to adverse impacts. These findings impact project management professionals and organizations involved in sustainable energy initiatives, providing valuable insights to enhance their risk management processes. This study paves the way for future research by adding more respondents and using other risk analysis methods, opening new avenues for improving risk management in green energy projects.

 

About the Authors

Assel Kozhakhmetova
Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

Ph.D., assistant professor, E-mail: a.kozhakhmetova@kbtu.kz



Aizhan Anarkhan
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan

PhD candidate, Email: aizhan2790@gmail.com  



References

1. Carro, A., Chacartegui, R., Tejada, C., Gravanis, G., Eusha, M., Spyridon, V., Papadopoulou, S., Ortiz C. (2021). Fmea and risks assessment for thermochemical energy storage systems based on carbonates. Energies, 14 (19), 6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196013

2. Chebotareva, G., Strielkowski, W. & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Risk assessment in renewable energy projects: A case of Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122110

3. Choo, B.L. & Go, Y. I. (2022), “Energy storage for large scale/utility renewable energy system-An enhanced safety model and risk assessment”, Renewable Energy Focus, 42, 79-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40807-023-00082-z

4. Deng, X., Low, S.P., Li, Q. & Zhao, X. (2014), “Developing competitive advantages in political risk management for international construction enterprises”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140 (9), 401- 404. https://doi.org/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0000836

5. Escande, J., Proust, C. & Le, Coze J. C. (2016), “Limitations of current risk assessment methods to foresee emerging risks: Towards a new methodology?”, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 43, 730-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.008

6. Foussard, C. & Denis-Remis, C. (2014). Risk assessment: methods on purpose? International Journal of Process Systems Engineering, 2(4), 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpse.2014.070090

7. Hyett, D. (2010). Environmental risk assessment in environmental impact assessment–optional or mandatory. IAIA10 Conference Proceedings: The Role of Impact Assessment in Transitioning to the Green Economy. 30th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 6-11.

8. Kozhakhmetova, A. K., Gabdullin, K. T., Kunanbayeva, D. A., Tazhiyeva, S. K. & Kydaybergenova, R. E. (2019). Green energy projects efficiency: A cross-industry evaluation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8137

9. Li, Y., Sun, L. & Zio, E. (2021). Comparison of the HAZOP, FMEA, FRAM and STPA Methods for the Hazard Analysis of Automatic Emergency Brake Systems. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 8(3), 12-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4051940

10. Liu, X. & Zeng, M. (2017). Renewable energy investment risk evaluation model based on system dynamics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 782-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.019

11. Marhavilas, P.K., Filippidis, M., Koulinas & G.K., Koulouriotis, D.E. (2020). A HAZOP with MCDM based risk-assessment approach: Focusing on the deviations with economic/health/environmental impacts in a process industry. Sustainability, 12 (3), 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030993

12. Bennett, G. (2005). Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control (3rd ed., S. Mannan, Ed.). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 122, 188-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.051

13. Mutlu, N.G. & Altuntas, S. (2019). Risk analysis for occupational safety and health in the textile industry: Integration of FMEA, FTA, and BIFPET methods, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72, 222-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.013

14. Pegels, A., Vidican-Auktor, G., Lütkenhorst, W., Altenburg T. (2018). Politics of green energy policy. The Journal of Environment & Development, 27 (1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496517747660

15. Pillay, A. & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 79 (1), 69-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5

16. Pritchard, C. L. (2001). Risk management: concepts and guidance, CRC Press, 117. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada214342

17. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK guide). Project Management Institute.

18. Pubule, J., Blumberga, D., Romagnoli, F., Rochas, M. (2012). Analysis of the environmental impact assessment of power energy projects in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23 (2), 190-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204930

19. Robichaud, C. O., Tanzil, D., Weilenmann, U. & Wiesner, M. R. (2005). Relative risk analysis of several manufactured nanomaterials: An insurance industry context. Environmental Science & Technology, 39 (22), 8985-8994. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050650

20. Roseke, B. (2018) Project Risk Management According to the PMBOK. Project Engineer. https://www.projectengineer.net/project-risk-management-according-to-the-pmbok/.

21. Sankar, N.R. & Prabhu, B.S. (2001). Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18 (3), 324-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710110383737

22. Santos, F.R.S.D. & Cabral, S. (2008). FMEA and PMBOK applied to project risk management. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 5, 347-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752008000200008


Review

For citations:


Kozhakhmetova A., Anarkhan A. Green energy project management: applying industry-specific risk assessment models. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2024;68(2):153–163. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.406

Views: 33

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2789-8253 (Print)
ISSN 2789-8261 (Online)