Kazakhstan Economy Sustainable Development:Trade Dynamics Impact
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.408
Abstract
The relevance of this study is underscored by the critical role of foreign trade in Kazakhstan's national economy, particularly in agricultural and livestock products. This research aims to comprehensively analyze the relationship between exported and imported agricultural and livestock product quantities and their respective USD values. The methodology employed includes regression analysis of Kazakhstan's trade data spanning from 2018 to 2022, focusing on evaluating these relationships' statistical significance and strength. This study's main findings underscore the audience's crucial role in implementing the study's recommendations. Import and export volumes have a profound impact, with particularly strong effects observed in the food and livestock sectors. While the export volumes of agricultural products do not significantly influence their trade values, import volumes exhibit a strong correlation. These insights emphasize the necessity for the audience's involvement in multifaceted approaches in trade policy and strategy development to foster sustainable economic growth in Kazakhstan. The study's recommendations for revising and optimizing trade strategies can enhance the efficiency and resilience of the national economy, improve policy-making and economic planning, and leverage these insights better to understand the dynamics of Kazakhstan's trade activities. The findings advocate for strategic investments in trade infrastructure, diversification of the export base, and fostering an attractive investment climate to leverage the benefits of increased trade turnover for sustainable economic development. This comprehensive approach will ensure Kazakhstan's robust integration into the global market, fostering long-term economic resilience and growth.
About the Authors
Berik Kadyrov
Alikhan Bokeikhan University, Semey, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD, Director of the Scientific Center for Economic Research, Email: bekadoc@mail.ru
Bibolat Kuantkan
Shakarim University of Semey, Semey, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Director of the Scientific Center for Economic Research, Email: bolat_76@mail.ru
References
1. Borsellino, V., Schimmenti, E., & El Bilali, H. (2020). Agri-food markets towards sustainable patterns. Sustainability, 12(6), 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062193
2. Bureau of National Statistics (2022).Available online: https://stat.gov.kz (Accessed on 20 May 2024)
3. Ercsey-Ravasz, M., Toroczkai, Z., Lakner, Z., & Baranyi, J. (2012). Complexity of the international agro-food trade network and its impact on food safety. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037810
4. Enahoro, D., Lapar, M. L. A., & Rich, K. M. (2014). Economic trade in livestock products. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 12(4), 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.947646
5. Fiksel, J. (2006). Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2 (2), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2006.11907980
6. Gani, A. (2017). The logistics performance effect in international trade. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(4), 279-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.012
7. Lu, Z., Ma, Y., Huang, J., & Azimi, A. (2020). A prediction method for carbon trading volume and price in China based on CEEMDAN and machine learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120564
8. Lun, Y. H. V., Carlton, J., & Bichou, K. (2016). Examining the economic impact of transport complex economies. Transport Economics and Policy, 1 (1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-016-0005-3
9. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Garcia-Menendez, L., & Suarez-Burguet, C. (2003). Impact of transport costs on international trade: The case of Spanish ceramic exports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100069
10. Mancini, L., Valente, A., Vignola, G. B., Mengual, E. S., & Sala, S. (2023). Social footprint of European food production and consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.005
11. Meyers, W. H., Ziolkowska, J. R., Tothova, M., & Goychuk, K. (2012). Issues affecting the future of agriculture and food security for Europe and Central Asia. Policy studies on rural transition, 3, 115-128.
12. Nordås, H. K., & Rouzet, D. (2016). The Impact of Services Trade Restrictiveness on Trade Flows. The World Economy, 40(6), 1155–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12424
13. Popescu, A. (2022). The importance of production and import for ensuring food availability in Romania. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 22(1), 407-418.
14. Rogachev, A., Mazaeva, T., & Egorova, E. (2015). Economic mechanisms for managing food security in the system “production-consumption-import”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s3p33
15. Shen, X., Jiang, H., Wang, Y., & Zhuang, J. (2021). Modeling and forecasting import and export values using LSTM neural networks. Economic Modelling, 95, 324-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.003
16. Smith, A., & Swain, A. (2010). The global economic crisis, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union: models of development and the contradictions of internationalization. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 51(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.51.1.1
17. Veenstra, A. W., & Haralambides, H. E. (2001). Multivariate autoregressive models for forecasting seaborne trade flows. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(4), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00024-4
18. Verburg, P. H., Mertz, O., & Espindola, G. (2009). The impacts of livestock agriculture on land use and ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 26(4), 753-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.003
19. Wang, J., & Lee, H. S. (2012). Fuzzy time series models for short-term forecasting of Taiwanese exports. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 14(3), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.006
20. Xiao, M., Gong, Z., & Zou, G. (2009). Fuzzy soft set based forecasting accuracy enhancement: Case study of Chongqing Municipality. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.01.003
Review
For citations:
Kadyrov B., Kuantkan B. Kazakhstan Economy Sustainable Development:Trade Dynamics Impact. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2024;68(2):118–134. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.408
Views:
49
JATS XML
Email this article 