Enhancing Cultural Competence through University-Business Collaboration: The Case of the Caspian Region
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.381
Abstract
The accelerating pace of globalization and digital transformation presents significant challenges and opportunities for higher education institutions, particularly in regions undergoing rapid economic and educational transformations such as the Caspian area. This study examines the implementation of innovative educational methodologies within the Erasmus PICASP Project, specifically focusing on the integration of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Practice Enterprises (PE) to enhance university-business collaboration in the Caspian area. By leveraging MOOCs for scalable, flexible learning and PEs for hands-on business management experience, the project fosters critical skills such as problem-solving, teamwork, and adaptability. There are covered the project's framework, educational approaches, and the potential impacts of these methods on the education landscape management, highlighting the shift towards multidisciplinary learning environments that integrate digital technologies. The project reported improved student engagement, enhanced practical skills, and increased employability of graduates. The findings highlight the importance of integrating local contexts with global educational standards to enhance employability and competitiveness, particularly in regions with diverse economic and educational landscapes. Furthermore, future research can contribute to the ongoing development and refinement of educational and cultural tools, ensuring they remain effective and relevant in an ever-evolving global landscape.
Keywords
Urbanization,
Sustainable Development,
Economic Development,
Regions,
Spatial Differences,
Spatial Polarization,
Environmental Sustainability,
Russia
Supporting agencies: This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (No. BR18574240).
About the Author
Massimo Bianchi
Administration Department, University of Bologna, Italy
Italy
Italy
Full Professor, Administration Department, Email: bianchimassimi1@gmail.com
References
1. AAVV. (2003-2008). Il laboratorio di simulazione d’impresa di Forlì e l’attività di PERTING srl impresa simulata. Perting srl.
2. Bali, M. (2014). MOOC pedagogy: Gleaning good practice from existing MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 44-56.
3. Bianchi, M. (2023). Eclettismo e multidisciplinarietà negli studi aziendali italiani. Economia Aziendale Online, 14(4), 941-951. https://doi.org/10.13132/2038-5498/14.4.941-951
4. Bianchi, M. (2024). Il contributo di Piero Mella all’eclettismo degli studi di economia aziendale. Economia Aziendale Online. Under review.
5. Bianchi, M., & Tampieri, L. (Eds.). (2005). Life Long learning and managerial development in transition countries. Il Ponte Vecchio. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/76221
6. Bianchi, M., & Tampieri, L. (Eds.). (2007). How to manage ECTS, training aids for teachers. Il Ponte Vecchio. Avaliable at: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/61146
7. Bianchi, M., Finell, P., Narenova, M., & Tampieri, L. (Eds.). (2007). The networking approach to ECTS in Kazakhstan: Manual on teaching methodology. Il Ponte Vecchio. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/61148
8. Clark, R. C. (2013). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
9. European Commission. (2020). Pilot courses and new didactics for teachers training in cultural tourism for the development of the Caspian Area (EPPKA2-CBHE-JP No. 617540-EPP-1-2020-1-IT). EAC-A02-2019-CBHE.
10. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2009.10.003
11. Hauptman, A., & Cohen, Y. (2011). The new role of simulations in learning: From instruction to construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 295-312.
12. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Available at: https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/33109/
13. Martin, P. (2018). Shut down the business school (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press.
14. Poettinger, M. (2021). Velleitarismo: il giudizio storico di Federico Caffè sul secondo dopoguerra. Ri iSES Ricerche di Storia Economica e Social, 2(1-2), 157-181
15. Porter, M. E, & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 36, 323-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
16. Ratten, V. (2014). Future research directions for collective entrepreneurship in developing countries: A small and medium-sized enterprise perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 22(2), 266-274. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2014.062505
17. Rowthorn, R., & Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrialization–Its causes and implications. International Monetary Fund.
18. Tan, X., & Tasir, Z. (2024). A systematic review on massive open online courses in China from 2019 to 2023. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 132(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped%2Fv13-i2%2F21111
19. Welsh, D. H., & Dragusin, M. (2013). The new generation of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs) and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 225-241.
Review
For citations:
Bianchi M. Enhancing Cultural Competence through University-Business Collaboration: The Case of the Caspian Region. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2024;68(2):90–105. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v68i2.381
Views:
34
JATS XML
Email this article 