ESG Transformation in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Bibliometric Evidence from Central Asia
https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-106-125
Abstract
In the context of digital transformation, climate risks and geo-economic instability, ESG approaches are becoming an important direction for the modernization of logistics, distribution systems and supply chain management.
The purpose of the study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications to identify the dynamics, thematic structure, and role of Central Asian countries in the development of ESG-oriented research in logistics and supply chain management.
The methodological basis of the study was made up of bibliometric analysis, the PRISMA approach, co-authorship analysis, co-word analysis and network visualization using the VOSviewer program. The initial empirical base was formed from publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection for 2021–2025. The results demonstrate a more than threefold increase in publication activity, from 70 publications in 2021 to 226 publications in 2025, reflecting the growing scientific interest in sustainable logistics systems and ESG-oriented supply chain management. The results of the network analysis revealed the key thematic areas of ESG research: digital ESG ecosystems, artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain technologies, supply chain sustainability, circular economy, green logistics, and ESG-oriented risk management. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are increasingly serving as connecting nodes between European and Asian research clusters, reflecting the growing importance of Central Asia in Eurasian transport corridors and in the transformation of sustainable logistics within an ESG-oriented economy. The results indicate that ESG is increasingly functioning as an integrated governance framework for adaptive, digitally connected, and sustainable supply chain systems amid climate risks, geo-economic instability, and global disruptions.
Keywords
Logistics,
Sustainable Logistics,
Logistics Economics,
Supply Chain Management,
Green Economy,
Supply Chain Resilience,
Central Asia
Supporting agencies: This research has been funded by the Science Committee MSHE RK (“Strategy of structural and technological modernization of the basic sectors of the economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan based on ESG: criteria, mechanisms and forecast scenarios” BR24993089)
About the Authors
G. Olzhebayeva
University of International Business named after K. Sagadiyev
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Gulbakhyt Olzhebayeva, PhD candidate
Almaty
E. Nurekenova
D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan State Technical University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Elvira Nurekenova, Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Professor
Ust-Kamenogorsk
References
1. Arynova, Z., Nakipova, G., Nurmaganbetova, A., Alina, G., Orazbayeva, A., & Kemirkulova, D. (2024). The role of distribution centres in the logistics infrastructure of Kazakhstan. Acta Logistica, 11(3), 451–460. doi: 10.22306/al.v11i3.531
2. Azimov, D., Stoyanova-Asenova, S., Petrova, M., & Asenov, A. (2024). Multi-criteria analysis techniques to assess the efficiency of using blockchain in logistics. Economics Ecology Socium, 8(2), 1–11. doi: 10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.2-1
3. Barbosa, A. D., Crispim, M. C., da Silva, L. B., da Silva, J. M. N., Barbosa, A. M., & Morioka, S. N. (2024). How can organizations measure the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria? Validation of an instrument using item response theory to capture workers’ perception. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3607–3634. doi: 10.1002/bse.3675
4. Barykin, S. E., Strimovskaya, A. V., Sergeev, S. M., Borisoglebskaya, L. N., Dedyukhina, N., Srklyarov, I., Sklyarova, J., & Saychenko, L. (2023). Smart city logistics on the basis of digital tools for ESG goals achievement. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5507. doi: 10.3390/su15065507
5. Buallay, A. (2022). Sustainability reporting and retail sector performance: Worldwide evidence. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 32(3), 311–330. doi: 10.1080/09593969.2022.2048410
6. Chouaibi, S., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Social and ethical practices and firm value: The moderating effect of green innovation: Evidence from international ESG data. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 442–465. doi: 10.1108/IJOES-12-2020-0203
7. Dai, T. L., & Tang, C. (2022). Frontiers in service science: Integrating ESG measures and supply chain management: Research opportunities in the postpandemic era. Service Science, 14(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1287/serv.2021.0295
8. De la Fuente, G., & Velasco, P. (2024). Pretending to be sustainable: Is ESG disparity a symptom? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20(2), 100418. doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100418
9. Galletta, S., Mazzu, S., & Naciti, V. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101684. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684
10. Garsaa, A., & Paulet, E. (2022). ESG disclosure and employee turnover: New evidence from listed European companies. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 77(4). doi: 10.7202/1097695ar
11. Kim, J., Kim, M., Im, S., & Choi, D. (2021). Competitiveness of e-commerce firms through ESG logistics. Sustainability, 13(20), 11548. doi: 10.3390/su132011548
12. Li, M. R. Y., Maffei, A., Mukhanova, G., Kuldeyev, E., Amralinova, B., & Tymbayeva, Z. (2025). Reverse supply chain optimization in Kazakhstan’s mining industry: Unlocking value from waste. Sustainability, 17(23), 10589. doi: 10.3390/su172310589
13. Long, H., Feng, G.-F., Gong, Q., & Chang, C.-P. (2023). ESG performance and green innovation: An investigation based on quantile regression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 5102–5118. doi: 10.1002/bse.3410
14. Qian, C., Gao, Y. Y., & Chen, L. F. (2023). Green supply chain circular economy evaluation system based on industrial Internet of Things and blockchain technology under ESG concept. Processes, 11(7), 1999. doi: 10.3390/pr11071999
15. Signori, S., San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J. L., & Rusconi, G. (2021). Stakeholder value creation: Comparing ESG and value added in European companies. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1392. doi: 10.3390/su13031392
16. Song, M., Ma, X., Zhao, X., & Zhang, L. (2022). How to enhance supply chain resilience: A logistics approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(4), 1408–1436. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-04-2021-0211
17. Tazhibekova, K., Shametova, A., Maharramov, R., & Makar, S. (2023). The role of information and digital tools in supply chain management during the Covid crisis. Acta Logistica, 10(1), 25–34. doi: 10.22306/al.v10i1.344
18. Zhang, L. (2021). Analysis of logistics efficiency based on green supply chain. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 30(5), 5557–5563.
19. Zhao, X. L., Huang, X. H., Liu, F., & Pan, L. (2024). Executive power discrepancy and corporate ESG greenwashing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96(Part A), 103533. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103533
Review
For citations:
Olzhebayeva G., Nurekenova E. ESG Transformation in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Bibliometric Evidence from Central Asia. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2026;70(2):106-125. https://doi.org/10.47703/2789-8253-2026-2-106-125
Views:
23
JATS XML
Email this article 