Analysis of Innovation Activity in the Industrial Market of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v2i64.87
Abstract
The growth of innovative potential is becoming the main driver of the competitiveness of the national economy. It is obvious that economic growth can be achieved only through the development of industrial and innovative achievements, the introduction of new technologies, and the use of modern computer technologies in production.
Unfortunately, in Kazakhstan, the development of innovations is not sufficiently developed now. We see a small number of innovative developments, a small number of patents. Science is not related to business. All this confirms the fact that it is necessary to develop innovative potential in Kazakhstan, stimulate the demand and supply of innovations.
Obviously, innovation is a key driver for the development of any enterprise. Only a wide assortment and high quality cannot ensure competitiveness; it is necessary to introduce innovations and new technologies. At the same time, innovative activity should be permanent and not be a one-time event.
It is necessary to analyze the innovation market by conducting regression analysis. Regression analysis is a method of modeling measured data and examining its properties.
To analyze the influence of the main indicators of innovative activity, 7 variables were selected, the data were considered in the context of 14 regions and two cities: Nur-Sultan (Astana) and Almaty.
About the Authors
Aizhana Maldynova
Kenzhegali Sagadiev University of International Business, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Maira Davletova
Turan University, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
References
1. Abylkassimova, Zh. (2020). Analysis of innovation activities of enterprises of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of national academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2 (384), 137 – 145 https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.52
2. Almerekov, N. & Kashkimbaeva, N. (2018). Economy of Kazakhstan: current state, problems, and solutions. Economics and business: theory and practice, (12-1), 27-32. doi: 10.24411/2411-0450-2018-10210
3. Bastl, M., Johnson, M., Lightfoot, H. & Evans, S. (2012). Buyer‐supplier relationships in a servitized environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(6), 650–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211230916
4. Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.015
5. Bizikova, T. & Pivovarova, A. (2017). Implementation of the Strategy "Kazakhstan-2050": the results achieved. Topical issues of economic sciences, (57), 307-312.
6. Boldyrevskiy, P., Kistanova, L. (2014). Forecasting models of the main indicators of innovative activity of industrial enterprises. Economic analysis: theory and practice, 29 (380), 52-57.
7. Bozhko, L. (2010). Prospects for the development of border regions in the context of the Industrialization Map of Kazakhstan. Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin, (26), 81-86.
8. Bustinza, O., Gomes, E., Vendrell-Herrero, F., Baines, T. (2017). Product-service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity. R&D Management, 49(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12269
9. Caurkubule, Zh., Kenzhin, Zh., Bekniyazova, D., Bayandina, G. & Dyussembekova, G. (2020). Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Insights into Regional Development, 2 (1), 469-479. http://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(6)
10. Costa, L., Cool, K., & Dierickx, I. (2012). The competitive implications of the deployment of unique resources. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2018
11. Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44 (2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610650201
12. Industrialization: access to domestic raw materials, investment card and incentive measures. (2021) Strategy2050.kz. https://strategy2050.kz/ru/news/industrializatsiya-dostupnost-k-otechestvennomu-syryu-investkarta-i-mery-stimulirovaniya/
13. Ishchenko-Padukova, O. & Movchan, I. (2017). Economic policy of import substitution: institutional conditions and imperatives of efficiency. Journal of Economic Regulation, 8 (1), 76-84
14. Jaakkola, E. & Hakanen, T. (2013). Value co-creation in solution networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.11.005
15. Key indicators of innovation activity. – URL: https://stat.gov.kz/official/industry/23/statistic/7
16. Kozhakhmet, S., Moldashev, K., Yenikeyeva, A. & Nurgabdeshov, A. (2020). How training and development practices contribute to research productivity: a moderated mediation model. Studies in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754782
17. Kravchenko, M. & Marchenko, N. (2016). Strategy of innovative activity of industrial enterprises. Science and Transport Progress. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 62, 25. 10.15802/stp2016/67283.
18. Lisenkov, V. (2021). Competitiveness of the economy of the republic of Kazakhstan. Science problems, 5 (64), 45-48.
19. Maldynova, A. (2018). Marketing innovations as a way of increasing the economic stability of the enterprise. Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference "Digitalization of the economy of Kazakhstan", 6, 35-42.
20. Maldynova, A., Osmanov, Z., & Galiyev, D. (2018). Formation of marketing strategy for promoting an innovative product. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13 (7), 1951-1958.
21. Mamrayeva, D. (2017). Study of Innovative Activity in Kazakhstan: Analysis of Quantitative Values and Commercialization Problems. Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Socio-economic and legal studies, 3 (2), 183-199. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-2-183-199
22. Onyusheva, I. (2017). Analytical and managerial issues of human capital in conditions of global competitiveness: the case of Kazakhstan. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16 (2), 198-209. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2017.16.2.17
23. Sadyrova, M., Yusupov, K., Imanbekova, B. (2021). Innovation processes in Kazakhstan: development factors. Journal of Innovative Enterprises, 10, 36 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00183-3
24. Seitzhanov, S. (2020). Stimulation of entrepreneurs’ innovative activity: evidence from Kazakhstan. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues. 7 (4), 2615-2629, http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(4)
25. Smirnova, Y. (2016). University – industry knowledge transfer in an emerging economy: Evidence from Kazakhstan, Science and Public Policy, 43 (5), 702-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv074
26. Spring, M. & Araujo, L. (2014). Indirect capabilities and complex performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34 (2), 150–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-01-2011-0034
27. Tumalavičius, V., Veikša, I., Načisčionis, J., Zahars, V., & Draskovic, V. (2017). Issues of the state and society security (part i): ensuring public security in the fight against crime. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 6 (3), 401-418. http://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.3(7)
28. Vasilyev, A., Vasilyev, V. (2016). Difference equations in a multidimensional space. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 21(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2016.1161668
29. Vigliarolo, F. (2020). Economic phenomenology: fundamentals, principles and definition. Insights into Regional Development, 2(1), 418- 429. http://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(2)
Review
For citations:
Maldynova A., Davletova M. Analysis of Innovation Activity in the Industrial Market of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2022;64(2):66-83. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v2i64.87
Views:
20
JATS XML
Email this article 