Economic Mechanisms to Overcome the Vulnerability of the Economy and Social Sphere of Strategically Important Settlements of Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v3i65.157
Abstract
In Kazakhstan, there is an urgent need to develop depressed settlements, which have their own characteristics associated with the historically established heterogeneity of the location of industries and deep differentiation in terms of socio-economic potential. Urban agglomerations, city centers, regions with raw material extractive industries, whose products are in demand on the global market, have best adapted to a market economy. As a result, many settlements in Kazakhstan turned out to be, as a rule, less developed and competitive, and even worse socially vulnerable. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly changed the structure and level of their development, revealed potential vulnerability issues, especially in small communities where there are no resources and materials to manage these consequences. The severity of these shocks will depend on the development of effective measures to address inequalities in strategically important communities. The main purpose of this article is to provide economic mechanisms to overcome the vulnerability of the economy and the social sphere of strategically important settlements in Kazakhstan. Estimated indicators in this study are based on the socio-economic indicator of Zhambyl, North Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan, West Kazakhstan, Atyrau and Mangystau regions for 2009-2020. The results of this study show that there is a significant disparity between settlements in the regions of Kazakhstan in terms of such factors as the level and quality of life. Most of the regional problems faced by the most vulnerable communities are widespread and systemic. Socio-economic problems, lack of resources, low level of industrial production and lack of state support are the main reasons for the vulnerability and depression of the studied settlements.
About the Authors
Perizat OrynbetKazakhstan
PhD, Email: perizat.orynbet@mail.ru
Zhansaya Imangali
United Kingdom
Master of science, Email: imangali.zhansaya@gmail.com
References
1. Amiri, H., Pirdadeh Beyranvand, M., Norouzi Amogin, F., & Alizadeh, S. (2018). Estimation Vulnerability and Resilience Indicators in Iran Economy. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies, 6(23), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.32598/JMSP.6.3.434
2. Bogoviz, A. V., Semenova, E. I., & Alekseev, A. N. (2017). New challenges for regional economy at the modern stage. In International conference on Humans as an Object of Study by Modern Science (pp. 574-580). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75383-6_73
3. Briguglio, L. (1997). Alternative economic vulnerability indices for developing countries. New York: Report prepared for the Expert Group on Vulnerability Index, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs-UN (DESA).
4. Briguglio, L., & Galea, W. (2003). Updating and augmenting the economic vulnerability index. Occasional paper, Islands and Small States Institute of the University of Malta, 4, 1-15.
5. Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2021). Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration, 36(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0952076719827068
6. Farrugia, N. (2004). Economic vulnerability: Developing a new conceptual framework and empirically assessing its relationship with economic growth [PhD. dissertation]. Msida, Malta: University of Malta.
7. Fleischmann, K., Daniel, R., & Welters, R. (2017). Developing a regional economy through creative industries: innovation capacity in a regional Australian city. Creative Industries Journal, 10, 119 - 138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2017.1282305
8. Gizatullin, K.G., Garipov, F., & Garipova, Z. (2018). Management of the Structural Transformation of Regional Economy. Economy of region, 1, 43-52.
9. Graziano, P. (2013). Vulnerability and resilience of the economic, social and environmental dimensions of Italian provinces. Regional studies association European conference. 1-28.
10. Heping, T., Pan, G., & Xianghao, Z. (2006). A Study of Regional Eco-Environment Vulnerability—A Case of “One-River-Two-Tributaries”, Tibet. Journal of Mountain Science, 24(6), 761-768.
11. Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
12. Kireeva, A. A., & Nurlanova, N. K. (2018). Organizational and economic mechanisms for the implementation of technological modernization of the regions of Kazakhstan [Organizatsionno-ehkonomicheskie mekhanizmy realizatsii tekhnologicheskoi modernizatsii regionov Kazakhstana]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, 4 (96), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2018.4.96.11 (In Russian)
13. Kolosovska, I., Zachepа, A., & Dzyana, H. (2020). Strategic planning for socio-economic development of communities as a tool of regional policy implementation. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools, 37(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2020.1.1
14. Koshanov, A. K. (2011). Globalization and the system of regional economic interests [Globalizatsiya i sistema regional'nykh ehkonomicheskikh interesov]. Reforma, 1(17), 4-9. (In Russian)
15. Liu, Y., Huang, J. Y., & Ma, L. (2010). The assessment of regional vulnerability to natural disasters in China based on DEA model. Geographical Research, 29(7), 1153-1162.
Review
For citations:
Orynbet P., Imangali Zh. Economic Mechanisms to Overcome the Vulnerability of the Economy and Social Sphere of Strategically Important Settlements of Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2022;65(3):105-115. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v3i65.157
JATS XML








