Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High- tech Project Management: the Experience of Japan, Israel and Kazakhstan
https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v4i66.214
Abstract
The practical implementation of high-tech projects is becoming essential and relevant throughout the world in the era of the digitalisation of various industries. The successful completion of high-tech projects will indeed support the development of domestic markets and the economy's competitiveness. It should be noted that high-tech projects involve breakthrough technologies and innovations, which, in turn, need effective management. This research aims to assess the relationship between the project management application processes and the effectiveness of projects in the industrial sector of countries such as Japan, Israel and Kazakhstan. The main focus of this paper is analysing high-tech project management in the engineering, green production, chemical and atomic sectors of these three countries. As a result, Japan is ahead of Israel and Kazakhstan. This research also contains an assessment of the maturity levels of project management of the chosen countries. The study used a systematic literature review, comparative analysis, quantitative data collection methods through interviews, statistical analysis and modelling. As a result, data were obtained on the project performance level in the selected countries, and approaches to managing high-tech projects in the industrial sector were proposed. A process methodology that may be implemented as a map for each set of projects has been created by assessing necessary success steps for high-tech projects. The study also recommends the number of instruments and techniques for Kazakhstan's high-tech project management. According to the findings of the statistical study, their application in the management of high-tech development will help the project be successfully completed.
Keywords
High-tech project management,
Project management,
Project management tools,
The maturity level of PM,
Success processes,
PMBoK standard,
High-tech marketing,
Digital marketing
Supporting agencies: This study was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education and of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP08053346)
About the Authors
Assel Kozhakhmetova
Kazakh-British Technical University, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
PhD, Assistant Professor, Email: aselekdream@gmail.com
Zhanar Tazhiyeva
Ainur Amirova
Almaty Management University, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Acting Associate Professor, Email: ainura20480@mail.ru
Urikkul Sandykbayeva
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Candidate of Philosophy Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Email: sandykbaeva@mail.ru
References
1. Guide, P. M. B. O. K. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK Guide.
2. Archibald, R. D. (2003). Managing high-technology programs and projects. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Dumaine, B. (1991). Closing the innovation gap. Fortune, 124(13), 56.
4. Dyussembekova, G. S., Krivochshyokova, L. P., Kunyazova, S. K., Khamitova, D. M., & Aiguzhinova, D. Z. (2016). Controlling the implementation of the public- private partnership (PPP) projects in the system of local strategic management. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2, 321–333.
5. Faitelson, Y. (2014). Israeli Statistics: From Demographics to Achievement in Industry and Agriculture. Academia.edu [Statıstıka Izraılıa: ot demografıı do dostıjenıı v promyshlennostı ı selskom hozıaıstve] (In Russ).
6. Getzoff M., (2022). Nations compete for capital, investment, knowledge, and innovation: who is number 1? Most Technologically Advanced Countries In The World 2022. Official information resource of the Global Finance Magazine. [updated May 04, 2022; cited March 30, 2022]. Available: https://www.gfmag.com/global- data/non-economic-data/best-tech-countries?page=2.
7. Jacobs, L., & Herbig, P. (1998). Japanese product development strategies. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 13(2), 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629810213351
8. Kozhakhmetova, A. & Asanova, A., (2018). The role of research and development projects in Kazakhstani high-tech market development. Vestnik Kazakhskoi akademii transporta i kommunikatsii imeni M. Tynyshpaeva, 104, 248-255.
9. Lee, J. C., & McCalman, D. (2008). Japanese management approaches: The fit for project management. International Journal of Management, 25(3), 584-594.
10. Satybaldin, A. A. (Ed.). (2019). Strategy of economic security and social stability of Kazakhstan: a collective monograph. [Strategııa ekonomıcheskoı bezopasnostı ı sotsıalnoı stabılnostı Kazahstana]. Institut ėkonomiki KN MON RK. (In Russ).
11. Sharma, A., Iyer, G. R., & Evanschitzky, H. (2008). Personal selling of high- technology products: The solution-selling imperative. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 7(3), 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332660802409639
12. The message of the Head of State to the people of Kazakhstan dated September 2, 2019. Constructive public dialogue is the basis of stability and prosperity of Kazakhstan. [Konstruktivnyi obshchestvennyi dialog – osnova stabil'nosti i protsvetaniya Kazakhstana]. Information and legal system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan "Adilet" (2019). [updated September 2, 2019; cited September 3, 2022]. Available: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1900002019/links (in Russ.).
13. Udal'tsova, N. L., Kozhanov, E. N., & Gorbulina, D. V. (2015). Japan's Innovative Success: Myth or Reality? Voprosy innovatsionnoi ehkonomiki, 5(2), 37-46.
14. Zwikael, O., & Globerson, S. (2006). Benchmarking of project planning and success in selected industries. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(6), 688-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770610709059
15. Zwikael, O., Shimizu, K., & Globerson, S. (2005). Cultural differences in project management capabilities: A field study. International Journal of Project Management, 23(6), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.04.003
Review
For citations:
Kozhakhmetova A., Tazhiyeva Zh., Amirova A., Sandykbayeva U. Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High- tech Project Management: the Experience of Japan, Israel and Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2022;66(4):55-65. https://doi.org/10.47703/ejebs.v4i66.214
Views:
20
JATS XML
Email this article 