ejebsEurasian Journal of Economic and Business StudiesНазвание журнала на русском2789-82532789-8261University of International Business named after K. Sagadiyev LLP10.47703/ejebs.v4i58.36ejebs-175Research ArticleСтатьиCooperative R&D and Technological Innovation Performance between Enterprises: An Empirical Analysis Based on the 2019 World Bank Survey of Kazakhstani EnterprisesNurbatsinAkanInstitute of Economics, Science Committee of the MES of the Republic of KazakhstanKazakhstan2020291220215845278Copyright © Nurbatsin A., 20212021Nurbatsin A.Nurbatsin A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ejebs.uib.kz/jour/article/view/175
cooperative R&Dtechnological innovation performanceknowledge spilloverR&D intensityR&D allianceReferencesAschhoff, B. and Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation -Happy Together? Review of Industrial Organization. 33 (1), 41-62.Aschhoff, B. and Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation -Happy Together? Review of Industrial Organization. 33 (1), 41-62.Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004). R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms - Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry. Research Policy. 34 (2). 209-233.Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004). R&D Cooperation and Innovation Activities of Firms - Evidence for the German Manufacturing Industry. Research Policy. 34 (2). 209-233.Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy. 33 (10), 1477-1492.Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy. 33 (10), 1477-1492.D'Aspremont, C. and Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review. 78 (5), 1133-37.D'Aspremont, C. and Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review. 78 (5), 1133-37.Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy. 31 (4), 477-492.Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy. 31 (4), 477-492.Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. (2005). The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments. In book: Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin's Statistical Family, pp.73 – 84.Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. (2005). The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments. In book: Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin's Statistical Family, pp.73 – 84.Kemp, R. G. M., de Jong, J. P. J., Folkeringa, M., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2003). Innovation and firm performance: differences between small and medium-sized firms.Kemp, R. G. M., de Jong, J. P. J., Folkeringa, M., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2003). Innovation and firm performance: differences between small and medium-sized firms.Klomp, L. and Leeuwen, G. (2001) Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach, International Journal of the Economics of Business. 8 (3) 343-364.Klomp, L. and Leeuwen, G. (2001) Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach, International Journal of the Economics of Business. 8 (3) 343-364.Miotti, E. and Sachwald, F. (2003), Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy. 32 (8), 1481-1499.Miotti, E. and Sachwald, F. (2003), Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy. 32 (8), 1481-1499.Papke, L. and Wooldridge, J. (1996). Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 11 (6). 619-32.Papke, L. and Wooldridge, J. (1996). Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 11 (6). 619-32.Peeters, C. and Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2006). Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 16 (1), 109-135.Peeters, C. and Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2006). Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 16 (1), 109-135.Arvanitis, S. (2012). How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? – An analysis based on Swiss micro data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 22 (5), 981-1007.Arvanitis, S. (2012). How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? – An analysis based on Swiss micro data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 22 (5), 981-1007.Srholec, M. (2014). Cooperation and Innovative Performance of Firms: Panel Data Evidence from the Czech Republic, Norway, and the UK. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 5 (1), 133-155Srholec, M. (2014). Cooperation and Innovative Performance of Firms: Panel Data Evidence from the Czech Republic, Norway, and the UK. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 5 (1), 133-155Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (6), 285-305.Teece, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (6), 285-305.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.